
|
 |
|
Divas, deceit
and ‘Docteur Rey’
Filmmaker Andrew Litvack
shares stories from his debut feature
By LOANN HALDEN
Features Editor
|
After graduating from college in 1987, Andrew Litvack made
the transatlantic journey to Paris – and never came back. Although he
says he made the trip “basically to learn French,” he found a way to
realize his childhood dream of sitting in a director’s chair.
For 10 years, he supported himself by subtitling hundreds
of French films into English and forged working relationships with
celebrated directors Jean-Luc Godard, Andre Techin and Youssef Chahine.
His connection with Chahine provided an introduction to James Ivory and
Ismail Merchant, the directing-producing team who have proven
themselves masters of the quiet, well-cast period film (“Howard’s End,”
“A Room With a View).
Litvack went on to serve as an assistant on the
Merchant-Ivory productions “Jefferson in Paris” and “A Soldier’s
Daughter Never Cries.”
Given that background, it wouldn’t take much imagination to
see corsets and countryside in his own future as a filmmaker. Instead,
with the encouragement of Ivory and Merchant (who executive produced),
Litvack wrote and directed an over-the-top comedy that skewers
psychoanalysis, dishes up plenty of mistaken identities and delivers a
divafest in the form of star Dianne Wiest, Vanessa Redgrave (playing
herself) and … Mick Jagger’s ex-squeeze Jerry Hall.
Set in Paris, “Merci Docteur Rey” begins its delirious run
with pot-loving Thomas Beaumont (Stanislas Merhar) “seeking same” on a
phone sex line. Before the day is over, he’ll witness a murder that
will begin to unravel years of deceit perpetuated by his mother,
narcissistic opera star Elisabeth Beaumont (Wiest). Throw in some
tainted brownies, a gay dad, numerous hustlers, and an incredibly
obsessive actress (Jane Birkin) unhinged by the death of her therapist
– and that only begins to scratch the surface of the story.
|
 |
|
AMERICAN IN PARIS: Gay filmmaker Andrew
Litvack moved to France after college and made it his home (but he does
often visit his parents in Boca Raton). His debut feature, “Merci
Docteur Rey,” unites an all-star English-speaking cast in the City of
Lights.
|
|
|
“Thank God ‘Merci Docteur Rey’ is not autobiographical,”
says Litvack via e-mail from France. “Although, much to my amusement it
was once presented as a documentary film and I remember thinking: ‘What
a crazy world it would be if my film were in fact a documentary.’ ”
He claims the idea “just came about” (although he was not
specifically queried about a fondness for pot brownies):
“First, that a boy would witness the murder of his father.
… Second that he’d cross paths with the crazy character played by Jane
Birkin in the analyst’s office,” Litvack says. “ I wanted to make two
different worlds, two different stories, collide, in that way.”
Still, for all the contemporary chaos unfolding on screen,
Litvack says he learned “tons” from the masters of restraint, Merchant
and Ivory.
“From Jim I learned how a director must behave on the set
with his crew and actors; how he must constantly concentrate on what he
wants and at the same time give everyone the impression that I’m all
ears,” says Litvack. “Most important, I learned from Jim how to sift
through the ideas and suggestions that people are always offering … to
pick and choose what I need best to realize my vision – if that word
doesn’t sound too pretentious.”
It becomes even more daunting when those suggestions are
coming from a leading lady with two Academy Awards on the shelf or a
supporting player who is a legend of stage and screen.
“I was able to unite such a great cast, I think, because I
had a script they all liked and a prestigious producer. After that it
was a question of persuading them to want to work with me,” says
Litvack. “With some of them, like Jane Birkin, I was lucky because she
was a friend beforehand. With Dianne, on the other hand, it was a
little scarier because I’d never met her until she read my script.
“Vanessa was intimidating at first because of her
reputation as the greatest living actress, but in fact she was terribly
easy to work with. It was funny how she insisted on playing such a mean
and imperious version of herself. I kept saying, ‘Vanessa, since you’re
playing yourself, we can make you nicer’ and she answered in the third
person: ‘Andy, Vanessa is not playing herself, she is playing a version
of herself.’ I was so astounded to hear her talking about herself in
the third person, like a character in a play – which I guess she is, in
my movie.”
And then there’s that cameo from Jerry Hall with plenty of
torch and twang.
“I’d met Jerry at a party with Mick Jagger. She was a real
hoot,” says Litvack. “A year or so later I asked if she’d mind doing a
cameo and she agreed.
“The best anecdote from the shoot concerns the day we were
shooting with Dianne, Jane and Vanessa. There were lots of Russian
political refugees on the set that day – both Jane and Vanessa are big
on humanitarian causes (and rightfully so) and perhaps on some level
they were, very nicely, trying to outdo each other. Then all of a
sudden Jerry Hall arrived, bedecked in jewels for her costume fitting
(she was shooting the next day). To see all these actresses, their
respective refugees, and then this Texan in diamonds was like a scene
from a Fellini movie.”
Perhaps the most notable aspect of “Merci Docteur Rey” is
that the cast dominates discussion rather than the gay content.
“I sure hope it’s a turn of tide for coming-out stories, which I feel
once served their purpose, but now are anachronistic,” says Litvack,
who is gay. “These days, with TV shows like ‘Queer Eye’ and ‘Will &
Grace,’ coming-out movies are like disease of the week movies …
vestiges from the ’70s we must get beyond, maybe like Elizabeth
McGovern and Lindsay Wagner.
“I like the idea that mainstream cinema is now presenting
gay characters matter-of-factly. It’s a fait accompli – they fit in
among the other characters. This doesn’t mean that I’m in any way
against movies with all gay characters or movies that explore more
hardcore themes, but I personally feel that most subversive gay cinema
is that which straight people watch and accept without batting an eye
(OK, they can bat their eyes a little) – it’s better to lure them in
than to exclude them.”
|
 |
| Top
Of Page |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|